honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:15,279 Points:1,144,250 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 6:25:43 AM
as for those whining about extra cost: the EPA already tests for most of those things anyways (if not all - depending on what will end up on the final label version). So, it only costs the extra ink and maybe a bit of computer power. Not much else. So, why whine?
|
honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:15,279 Points:1,144,250 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 1, 2010 6:16:40 AM
quattro: they already have that on the web. You will have to look for it, true, but it's out there
|
bell05

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:6,889 Points:1,411,660 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 3:52:55 PM
quattro02, I am with you.
And SVmike, I share the same scare.
|
SVmike

Champion Author
California
Posts:1,426 Points:307,850 Joined:Dec 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:47:57 PM
TWS658: "More government regulations to add to the cost of transportation. "
How does this add more than the cost of a sheet of paper to each car's cost? The EPA issues a grade for each car. The dealer puts the sticker on the car. The EPA already tests each car and has all the data they need.
|
Blue48

Champion Author
Illinois
Posts:4,975 Points:1,175,145 Joined:Feb 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:21:33 PM
TIME WILL TELL..IF THIS WILL DO ANY GOOD!
|
OnEmptyMO

Champion Author
St. Louis
Posts:3,449 Points:1,046,570 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:05:51 PM
Will it really make a difference? Come on, we are not stupid, we can read...well maybe most of us can.
|
FlyNFool

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:5,965 Points:1,224,980 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:05:42 PM
EPA needs to go find something useful to do.
|
quattro02

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:2,243 Points:171,980 Joined:Nov 2003
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:05:24 PM
This new label will probably not contain any information that is not already available. It will just put it in a common format that is easy to compare. Very few buyers are willing to do the homework to seriously comparison shop. So many just say "I like the blue one." and write a check. This will help those people.
Come to think of it. We could use a similar label for our politicians running for office so that people don't just vote for the most handsome or whatever candidate.
|
jeromehasbargen

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:3,204 Points:627,745 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:05:20 PM
It's good to have this information when shopping for a new car. Hopefully it won't be just another thing to confuse the buyer.
|
pnd1

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:4,273 Points:859,095 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 1:04:46 PM
Doesn't the EPA have something better to do like inspect some oil drilling rigs in the Gulf?
|
lightbulbman2008

Champion Author
Worcester
Posts:188,500 Points:1,122,125 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 12:55:49 PM
will it work?
|
TXGasPriceSpy

Champion Author
Fort Worth
Posts:5,335 Points:1,012,300 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 12:55:27 PM
How much will this grading system cost the taxpayers???
|
MAC48

All-Star Author
Dallas
Posts:728 Points:499,925 Joined:Dec 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 12:15:58 PM
The environmental impact part of this new label is really worthless for an electric vehicle unless there is also an estimate of how much pollution the generation of the electricity used to recharge the EV is also provided. This could be done by state or major metropolitan area so that one could compare the decrease in vehicle emissions with the increase in power plant emissions when deciding whether to get an EV versus a gas or diesel powered vehicle.
Without this type of pertinent information, this is just another propaganda effort to further the current agenda of the administration and the greenies and absolutely no help to the average consumer.
|
indyjim

Champion Author
Indianapolis
Posts:7,411 Points:1,857,645 Joined:Jul 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 11:47:17 AM
None of that info compares gas to hydrogen to electric. Cost per mile travelled seems to be the best way to compare. Emissions etc. can be added in a separate location. Another govt. agency wasting their time, our time, and our tax money.
|
bills55

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:2,207 Points:513,955 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 10:48:54 AM
I wonder if all these anti government people just anti democratic government?
|
Badmoon

Champion Author
Massachusetts
Posts:5,946 Points:1,186,540 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 10:39:21 AM
Energy cost per year just like appliances.
|
CharlieC08

Champion Author
Colorado
Posts:6,394 Points:1,154,200 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 10:25:46 AM
Gvmt. garbage.
|
bruceha2000

Champion Author
Vermont
Posts:2,136 Points:983,555 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 10:03:20 AM
TAT36 (@ 9:47)
Yes, the roads need to be fixed and if tax on fuel is the only way to get that money from the people who use the roads, they will have to figure out other ways to get that money.
However, GPS? I'm not sure. Is it supposed to keep track of all miles driven in each state? The gas tax in most states is higher than the federal tax.
How then are you charged for the miles driven in each state? I guess it could work the same as it does now, whatever state you are in gets to tax you on the total miles driven between fill-ups (as opposed to taxing the amount of fuel used) regardless of where you drove those miles.
|
FOM_Kompressor

All-Star Author
St. Louis
Posts:603 Points:433,665 Joined:Jul 2010
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:58:16 AM
Pretty soon you won't be able to test drive a car on the lot because one window will be blocked entirely by stickers!!!
|
karmadrome

Champion Author
Wisconsin
Posts:1,290 Points:417,855 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:52:41 AM
Has anyone ever found these stickers to be accurate in real world driving?
@ Conde... we've been at that point for a long, long time now.
|
bruceha2000

Champion Author
Vermont
Posts:2,136 Points:983,555 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:50:42 AM
LongPlay: "but some of the other things like CO2 most people could care less!"
Perhaps (and you mean "could NOT care less") but maybe if people start seeing those numbers they might make decisions based on them if they are considering 2 cars and there is a significant difference in the air pollution scores. You can't use information you don't have.
|
MikeMotorhead

Veteran Author
Detroit
Posts:335 Points:240,585 Joined:Oct 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:48:01 AM
Who's got time to read this. Especially with all the paperwork to buy a new vehicle.
|
TAT36

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:4,443 Points:847,445 Joined:Sep 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:47:42 AM
Looks like an expansion of the EPA. The article was hard to follow since the Prius was rated electrically between 40 - 56 MPG when it already gets in the high 40s. The VW gets close to 50 MPG on their TDI models. The expansion of the EPA probably will entail how to tax these vehicles since they do not pay the road tax in gas for the miles driven. GPS looks like it is closer for all vehicles to tack mileage driven during the year and put it on your tax bill at the end of the year.
|
condé

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:2,752 Points:1,588,745 Joined:Oct 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:47:23 AM
Cost and dumb idea... Are we really that dumb out there! It is coming to the point that anything the government does is 'BAD'!
|
bruceha2000

Champion Author
Vermont
Posts:2,136 Points:983,555 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:39:40 AM
GM will need a LOT of stickers for their Flex Fuel vehicles. - Label 1 (D to A-) for gas - Label 1 (D to A-) for E85 - Label 2 for gas - Label 2 for E85 (non existent) - Label 3 for gas - Label 3 for E85 (non existent)
Label 2 for FFV is worthless as it only lists the gasoline MPG. People have NO WAY to see that they are being cheated with E85.
|
2granny

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:7,160 Points:1,001,530 Joined:Apr 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:32:04 AM
What a waste of money.
|
techque

Champion Author
St. Louis
Posts:6,383 Points:1,993,310 Joined:Apr 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:29:56 AM
Sadly, the jerks who buy hummers and other monster SUV's and PUs won't care !@!
|
LongPlay

Champion Author
Albuquerque
Posts:2,896 Points:841,310 Joined:May 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:21:17 AM
The EPA should shut down and save us some money. Most people would like some idea about the expected mileage, but some of the other things like CO2 most people could care less!
|
TWS658

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:3,066 Points:658,425 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:19:48 AM
More government regulations to add to the cost of transportation.
|
Gas_Buzzer

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:11,860 Points:2,167,795 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:19:33 AM
The EPA is another mega-govermental waste of tax dollars. These beaurocrats need to work REAL jobs and get their noses out of our A$$es.
|
sam7777

Veteran Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:320 Points:66,460 Joined:Jun 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:17:59 AM
Another worthless standard. What a waste of money for the government and car companies that will be forced to comply.
|
maske_2222

Champion Author
Manitoba
Posts:5,709 Points:1,158,615 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:16:44 AM
a guideline...
|
my2002m

Champion Author
Tulsa
Posts:3,794 Points:1,207,545 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:16:30 AM
Great, lets confuse people even more buy issuing new guidelines that no one understands. And by the way spending taxpayer money to do it.
|
Diesel_Ram

Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:4,232 Points:1,057,255 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:16:13 AM
What a waste of time and money.
|
Voltus

Champion Author
Miami
Posts:6,247 Points:1,125,980 Joined:May 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:15:02 AM
more bureaucracy...
|
Gassed01

Champion Author
Toronto
Posts:4,078 Points:1,348,015 Joined:Jan 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:14:48 AM
Government intervention trying to help us. OK - do it. Make the label so complicated and long that no one will read it.
|
hwmillerster

Champion Author
Missouri
Posts:4,444 Points:1,007,370 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:13:23 AM
Only a small fraction of the automobile buying public will use this information.
|
marbljk

Sophomore Author
Alabama
Posts:184 Points:2,008,735 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:12:29 AM
What they really need is a cost per mile to operate a vehicle each year based on a standard price for gasoline and cost per KWH adjusted each year based on average across the US.
|
2gjh

Champion Author
North Dakota
Posts:2,329 Points:2,190,200 Joined:Nov 2003
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:11:38 AM
Your tax dollars hardly at work. How many millions did the new labeling system cost the government/industry?
|
goodbuy

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:5,519 Points:994,735 Joined:May 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:11:27 AM
WHY!! So they can screw something else up.
|
bruceha2000

Champion Author
Vermont
Posts:2,136 Points:983,555 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:11:11 AM
I'm not so sure how this will work out. Too much information and not enough information at the same time.
- Electric only: first 11 miles - 50 miles before switching to gas mode - There is no info on the charge time. Is that 110V 15A, 220V 30A, 220V 60A, public charging station?1) Where are the city and highway numbers under electric only and under gas only? I don't care what the combined number is if I drive a LOT of highway or a LOT of city.
2) They don't even HAVE an electric ONLY number for this 'PHEV-Predominately blended' type car. Nor do they have a KWH/100 miles number so you can figure out how much electricity is used to go the 11 'all electric' miles? In fact, this sticker would have NO meaning on a LEAF or Telsa.
3) Why is the "this vehicle gets 53 MPGe" info in small print at the bottom? That is the number you would be using to compare to an all gas or diesel vehicle.
At least they DO have the MPGe number (33.7 KWH = 1 gallon gas).
Definitely have to Look at all the stickers to make sense of it. At least the D to A+ stickers give the city and highway MPGe
[Edited by: bruceha2000 at 8/31/2010 9:13:38 AM EST]
|
Helms

Champion Author
Fort Worth
Posts:4,729 Points:1,496,005 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:10:39 AM
If the EPA were to be graded it would be an F -!!!
|
oilrobber

Champion Author
Miami
Posts:7,297 Points:1,469,335 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:09:54 AM
Sorry, I have no trust or respect for the Federal Government or the EPA. I am sick of the lies and propaganda put out by both!
|
Goatroper

Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:4,689 Points:914,495 Joined:Apr 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:08:11 AM
Yeah, whatever.
|
I10Express

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:6,321 Points:1,176,970 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:03:35 AM
The federal government trying to tell you how to think with partial information.
|
Jusy

Sophomore Author
Nashville
Posts:104 Points:344,180 Joined:Jun 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:02:31 AM
I like the idea of a standard fuel economy sticker with this type of information. It should not be the only criteria for buying a car, but it will be one of my considerations. If the tags are not standardized, its difficult to compare.
|
Buck_on_Bass

Champion Author
Tennessee
Posts:5,190 Points:1,042,340 Joined:Jul 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:02:27 AM
The simplistic letter grade label is a "one-size-fits-all" solutions that will discredit the markings when the public's experience does not match the simplistic marking. To make an informed decision, the public will need information and will need to take the time to learn to use that information.
The smartphone scan code is a good idea if it has good information to back is up. A spreadsheet where one could enter their driving information and then compare different vehicles would be better than a simplistic grade that may not reflect one's driving needs.
|
bowser12304

Champion Author
Pennsylvania
Posts:1,515 Points:671,955 Joined:Dec 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:01:56 AM
this gives us an idea of the mileage, but we all drive differently
|
toyrunner300

Champion Author
Calgary
Posts:3,219 Points:1,214,960 Joined:Jan 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:01:53 AM
I did read their pdf files and it doesn't make too much sense. They put a letter on it for a MPG range, so why not put the MPG instead of a range?
|
nozzle46

Champion Author
Little Rock
Posts:4,876 Points:1,098,530 Joined:Jul 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 31, 2010 9:01:44 AM
Looks like a lot of thought has gone into this. The more information the better.
|