Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    3:05 PM

GasBuddy News Article

49
votes
Houston Police attempt felony charge on woman holding speed trap sign

GasBuddy Blog -- Natalie Plummer admits it's probably something she'll never do again: holding a sign warning motorists of an approaching speed trap.

According to ABC News, Plummer was riding her bicycle home from a nearby grocery store when she saw what appeared to be police pulling over "random" drivers. She parked her bike, took one of the paper bags from the grocery store, and wrote "Speed Trap!!!" on it to display to motorists passing by.

I was completely abiding by the law," Plummer told ABC's affiliate KRTK. "I was simply warning citizens of a situation ahead."
Within a mere minutes, a Houston Police officer allegedly approached Plummer, whom he said was in the street (to which Plummer denies), and arrested her, threatening...


Read the Full Article

Submitted Jun 29, 2012 By: PD
Category: GasBuddy Official Blog > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: Houston Police attempt felony charge on woman holding speed trap sign Post a Reply Back to Topics
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
baddog58
Champion Author Texas

Posts:1,193
Points:707,580
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Aug 23, 2012 3:40:09 PM

Any lawyers reading this? Sounds to me like she is well within her rights.
Profile Pic
bhb2009
Veteran Author Flint

Posts:288
Points:786,510
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2012 3:29:26 PM

this reminds me of a youtube posting on topless girls holding signs about speed traps ... apparently the police didn't bother -- because it worked...
Profile Pic
gasokie
Champion Author Oklahoma

Posts:3,487
Points:1,346,755
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2012 2:02:26 PM

Is Natalie still holding that sign up? How many months must this poor lady do this?
Profile Pic
pfone1847
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:3,326
Points:651,280
Joined:Oct 2010
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2012 10:19:13 AM

Old and still bogus. If the pigs can use speed traps we should be able to out them.
Profile Pic
albert2008
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:7,487
Points:1,507,735
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2012 9:36:10 AM

old news
Profile Pic
clpassenubye
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:3,374
Points:776,055
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2012 6:32:31 PM

Wny?
Profile Pic
pfone1847
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:3,326
Points:651,280
Joined:Oct 2010
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 7:20:05 AM

So what if she did it? Cops are liars and cheats. They should be outted
Profile Pic
albert2008
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:7,487
Points:1,507,735
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2012 8:52:00 AM

old news
Profile Pic
SovietSunrise
Champion Author San Antonio

Posts:7,910
Points:1,117,680
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2012 8:34:07 AM

There's a reason this news article continues to pervade the forum: it's because we are all tired of the revenue generators and we won't put up with it!!!

Report Speed Traps & Fight Back!
Profile Pic
ggg452
Champion Author Manitoba

Posts:1,710
Points:359,525
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: Aug 9, 2012 8:33:01 AM

OK...so?
Profile Pic
stonecold5005
All-Star Author Waco

Posts:819
Points:20,605
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Aug 8, 2012 11:48:43 AM

sad
Profile Pic
tfsmith1
Rookie Author Washington

Posts:13
Points:29,795
Joined:Jun 2012
Message Posted: Jul 22, 2012 5:38:37 PM

Cops try anything if they want, what was the law.
Profile Pic
clpassenubye
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:3,374
Points:776,055
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Jul 22, 2012 4:40:20 PM

sad
Profile Pic
geminijax
Champion Author Jacksonville

Posts:16,925
Points:2,742,975
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 11:29:49 PM

gasokie: "It beats me why citizens put up with "law enforcement" spending time bothering and molesting the motoring public with speed traps when crime is out of control."

Quite simple. Traffic tickets raise revenue. As more counties/municipalities feel the budget pinch, expect more of the same.
Profile Pic
Reishman
Veteran Author Illinois

Posts:384
Points:537,615
Joined:Sep 2006
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 6:27:16 PM

I'm on a speed boat!
Profile Pic
SovietSunrise
Champion Author San Antonio

Posts:7,910
Points:1,117,680
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 5:28:39 PM

Revenue generators.

*facepalm*
Profile Pic
sluggopyle
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:23,608
Points:1,075,890
Joined:Dec 2005
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 5:01:12 PM


=> I would presume the logical thing to do would be to stop, wave down oncoming traffic, and place, or have placed, a phone call to the appropriate authorities to deal safely with the hippo.
This is getting a little silly. We are now a long way off the topic. <=

Agreed, but in the time it takes to do what you just described, that motorist and fifty more behind him have hit the hippo. Again, a light flash, being an unusual/unexpected signal, simply means "something is up". That is all it CAN mean. To suggest that there's some different kind of attention that looks for speed traps and doesn't notice a hippo on the road, yes that is quite silly.


=> They should have just gave her a ticket & let her go. <=

a ticket for................ what?
Aye, there's the rub.

Profile Pic
RONALD777
Champion Author Houston

Posts:3,524
Points:391,430
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 3:54:29 PM

They should have just gave her a ticket & let her go.
Profile Pic
HickoryHacker
Rookie Author Greensboro

Posts:1
Points:145
Joined:May 2012
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 10:40:42 AM

The claim by many law enforcement agencies is 'that speed traps are not meant to catch people speeding but rather to get motorists to slow down' and hopefully avoid accidents. They call it visual enforcement, many times it is parking an empty police vehicle in a very visible place.

It would appear in this case the police took the women's actions to be a threat to their power as law enforcement officers. It highlights the problem of a minority of officers, they are not public servants, but power mongers that wear a uniform to gain a level of power they are not able to command themselves. This is a primary reason why I left a successfull law enforcement position many years ago.
Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:23,067
Points:3,550,120
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Jul 21, 2012 5:26:07 AM

"So does my safety in my home to be free of fear and so my kids can play outside."
I presume you would like them to be able to play without fear of speeders on their street endangering their lives when they try to walk to a friend's home, or the playground?

"If I see a hippopotamus standing in the oncoming roadway, of course I'm going to warn the driver approaching around the bend with a light flash. What else would I do, just say nothing and let him go commit hippocide on the basis that he might think I'm warning of a speed trap?"
I would presume the logical thing to do would be to stop, wave down oncoming traffic, and place, or have placed, a phone call to the appropriate authorities to deal safely with the hippo.
This is getting a little silly. We are now a long way off the topic.
That being said, I have never just flashed my lights at somebody when a moose or buffalo was in the road, I stopped and waved others to a halt to warn them. What if I flashed my lights, they were speeding, and they ran into the moose while looking for the police car hiding in the ditch, because that is the most common first thought? Nobody thinks "hey, look at the guy flashing his headlights, there must be a wild animal charging cars".

Profile Pic
gasokie
Champion Author Oklahoma

Posts:3,487
Points:1,346,755
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2012 11:31:28 PM

It beats me why citizens put up with "law enforcement" spending time bothering and molesting the motoring public with speed traps when crime is out of control. Home burglaries abound and people suffer losses from criminals at an escalating rate. Citizens don't feel safe in their own neighborhoods. Why? All the cops are out on the highway getting in the way and making a pest out of themselves...trying to create revenue. Oh, they whine they are just trying to save lives and I realize that traffic safety has it's place. So does my safety in my home to be free of fear and so my kids can play outside. If you're tired of it attend your next council meeting...do something about it. Let 'em know! It's your city, state and country.
Profile Pic
SovietSunrise
Champion Author San Antonio

Posts:7,910
Points:1,117,680
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2012 11:16:27 PM

Revenue generation. It's something that no one should ever stand for.
Profile Pic
Vette1967
Champion Author Albany

Posts:6,107
Points:1,303,700
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Jul 20, 2012 9:44:11 PM

An old post.
Profile Pic
sluggopyle
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:23,608
Points:1,075,890
Joined:Dec 2005
Message Posted: Jul 19, 2012 12:18:16 AM


=> When we lived in Germany, when somebody flashed lights at you on the highway it meant "turn your lights on". <=

Oh yes, that too. Not long ago somebody flashing their lights on a smaller road also commonly meant "turn your lights *off* (usually in the early morning when they'd been driving since dawn and forgot their lights were still on). Since the States caught DRL disease, that warning doesn't work so well any more.

In any case simply declaring by personal fiat that "flashing lights has always been understood to mean ..." in no way whatsoever proves the intent of any given flasher. If I see a hippopotamus standing in the oncoming roadway, of course I'm going to warn the driver approaching around the bend with a light flash. What else would I do, just say nothing and let him go commit hippocide on the basis that he might think I'm warning of a speed trap?

So it doesn't mean "if you are speeding, slow down" since it's not one driver's place to tell others what speed to drive; the flash means simply that *something* just ahead bears watching. That's simple communication between drivers; it's got nothing to do with "disrespect for the law"; it's an alert about road conditions. The only meaning we can safely ascribe to a headlight flash is "be alert"; it's impossible with that method to articulate exactly what to be alert for. And there aren't a whole lot of other ways to communicate at all in that setting, so a flash is pretty much it, unless you're a really really fast sign painter.


[Edited by: sluggopyle at 7/19/2012 12:22:44 AM EST]
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:22,606
Points:2,256,995
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 10:12:24 PM

rumbleseat - "It is symbolic of the generally decreasing disrespect for the law."

Assuming you meant either "increasing disrespect for the law" or "decreasing respect for the law", much of that is due to the proliferation of stupid laws and stupid government behavior, like speed traps.

Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:23,067
Points:3,550,120
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 7:38:43 PM

"Could be a deer, a fresh accident, a spill, ice, water, rockslide, speed trap, fallen tree, alien spaceship, anything."
I have been driving since 1965. The only time I have seen flashing lights to warn of a dangerous situation people were flashing lights almost maniacally, and usually waving as well. That happens rarely.
Simple flashing has always been understood to mean "if you are speeding, slow down". That happens regularly, and more now than years ago because a higher percentage of drivers are speeding. It is symbolic of the generally decreasing disrespect for the law.
When we lived in Germany, when somebody flashed lights at you on the highway it meant "turn your lights on".
Profile Pic
rjhenn
Champion Author Des Moines

Posts:22,606
Points:2,256,995
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 7:18:10 PM

Basically, if the government wants more people to agree with speed traps, they need to set rational speed limits, not limits designed simply to improve revenue.
Profile Pic
clpassenubye
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:3,374
Points:776,055
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 1:51:17 PM

theres a fine line between law enforcement and criminals
Profile Pic
sluggopyle
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:23,608
Points:1,075,890
Joined:Dec 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 12:26:56 PM


(whew, that was wordy. Never post with a cup of strong coffee by your side ;-)

The Cliff's Notes version of the last: the objection to speed traps has little to do with speed and far more to do with entrapment. Consider in this very case, the trap-sentinel isn't even a motorist but a bicyclist -- who stands to be endangered, not empowered, by speeders, so encouraging speeding is clearly not her point.





[Edited by: sluggopyle at 7/18/2012 12:28:44 PM EST]
Profile Pic
sluggopyle
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:23,608
Points:1,075,890
Joined:Dec 2005
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 12:03:47 PM


So do I; my last speeding ticket was in the 1980s (70 mph on a rural Puritan freeway, dropped) and before that I don't even remember. That's not the point.

=> I have long been on record as being against the flashing of lights to warn miscreants of radar cars. <=

And there's no way to articulate what that flashing means. When I flash my lights at oncoming traffic (or someone does for me), regardless what the weather is, it means "something" unexpected is ahead to be alert for. Could be a deer, a fresh accident, a spill, ice, water, rockslide, speed trap, fallen tree, alien spaceship, anything. You can't spell it out in Morse code; not enough time. And the presence of an active speed trap, with cars pulled off to the shoulder, IS a road hazard just like the rest, regardless how fast you're going when you get to it.

=> The warning would ONLY affect people who were already speeding, right? <=

Not at all, and you missed the point, which is that your assumption that she's tipping off speeders necessarily assumes there ARE speeders, and that has simply not been established at that point, therefore there are no speeders to tip off. This is more a legal point for the police though.

But back to the effect. Assuming the sign is legible (which is doubtful in this case), then it affects *everybody* by demanding and refocusing their attention. And think about it-- it would have that exact same effect if she just made it up and there was really no speed trap at all. Even if I haven't been speeding my natural reaction is to check my speed.

Guess what-- speed limit signs do the same thing. "Radar enforced" signs do the same thing. Automated "your speed" signs, ditto. Some PDs park an empty police car in a prominent spot on the median-- nobody's in there but it creates an effective visual cue. ALL of these grab and refocus attention. Shall we charge the police chief who ordered that empty police car parked there with a felony too?

Important distinction: the citizen in this case is not warning citizens not to speed; if they want to speed, they will. She's warning them of the presence of a trap. If a PD were really interested in controlling speed where it matters, they'd be in those places-- not hiding in the shadows of a stable stretch of road just to enforce what is at that point little more than an arbitrary number.

I've seen Pennsylvania state police sit at the bottom of a long hill on the PA Turnpike, to enforce 55. That's just plain evil. And creates a danger to traffic for the sake of a number, while somebody ten miles away on a flat piece of road is doing 112. Police get hung up on the letter of the law at the expense of the spirit. That doesn't benefit anybody.

Just for balance here, there are certainly times when I know of a speed trap ahead, see some oncoming a-hole driving like one and deliberately *don't* warn him; that's the rare case of the deserving meeting their fate, but in general, speed traps don't catch dedicated speeders; they trap a general population who happened to be going by at the time. In that sense it's quite an unbalanced application of the law.


[Edited by: sluggopyle at 7/18/2012 12:08:34 PM EST]
Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:23,067
Points:3,550,120
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 4:00:19 AM

"you'd have to know in advance that lawbreaking was going on there, and without scanning speeds *before* the point where she's standing,"

The warning would ONLY affect people who were already speeding, right?

"This is basically the same thing as flashing your headlights or using trucker hand signals to warn of a situation ahead."

I have no problem with truckers alerting of an accident or bad road conditions. It has long been accepted when driving in bad weather conditions that if the lights on a semi we are following start flashing we slow down. I have long been on record as being against the flashing of lights to warn miscreants of radar cars. Again, I repeat, if somebody wants to speed, they are responsible for that action.
I take responsibility if I speed, I don't expect others to aid me in doing so. My last speeding ticket was 1984, previous to that, somewhere around 1976. I drive like a responsible human being.
Profile Pic
SovietSunrise
Champion Author San Antonio

Posts:7,910
Points:1,117,680
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 18, 2012 12:08:27 AM

Revenue generators are just plain pathetic.
Profile Pic
99dakota
Champion Author Providence

Posts:8,255
Points:2,200,100
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Jul 17, 2012 6:31:18 PM

Old story...
Profile Pic
sluggopyle
Champion Author North Carolina

Posts:23,608
Points:1,075,890
Joined:Dec 2005
Message Posted: Jul 17, 2012 5:22:31 PM


=> While I agree this is no felony, it should, indeed, carry some kind of minor charge, she is, after all, assisting lawbreakers. You would be mighty ticked if burglars were in your home, and some lady ran over and yelled at them that she saw the police coming, so they could get away clean. Same poop, different pile. <=

False conclusion, Rumbleseat. To proclaim she's "assisting lawbreakers", you'd have to know in advance that lawbreaking was going on there, and without scanning speeds *before* the point where she's standing, you have no way to know that. Making that assumption is no more honest than a police department quota that requires said officers to turn in X number of speeding tickets even if they have to contrive them. So you have a false analogy here; it's not the equivalent of a lookout as you describe; it's more like a "neighborhood watch" sign. Either way, nobody's ability to commit a crime is infringed.

This is basically the same thing as flashing your headlights or using trucker hand signals to warn of a situation ahead. Actually less than that, because that sign she's got is almost impossible to read anyway.

Basically the police are just pissed because they set a trap and somebody outed it. If they don't want that happening, then they shouldn't be setting traps.

I agree 100% with Gasokie. Let the police expend their energy on problems already going on, rather than playing with traps set up where nothing is going on.


[Edited by: sluggopyle at 7/17/2012 5:23:31 PM EST]
Profile Pic
stonecold5005
All-Star Author Waco

Posts:819
Points:20,605
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Jul 17, 2012 9:30:50 AM

ok
Profile Pic
gasokie
Champion Author Oklahoma

Posts:3,487
Points:1,346,755
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Jul 15, 2012 2:34:25 PM

A lot of us consider people who mount roadblocks or set up speed traps as no more than a bunch of armed thugs. Which they very often are.

We need police to be protecting us from crime...not molesting us out on the highways.
Profile Pic
albert2008
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:7,487
Points:1,507,735
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Jul 15, 2012 8:44:48 AM

not good
Profile Pic
99dakota
Champion Author Providence

Posts:8,255
Points:2,200,100
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Jul 14, 2012 5:09:41 PM

Government run amok
Profile Pic
99dakota
Champion Author Providence

Posts:8,255
Points:2,200,100
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Jul 14, 2012 5:09:40 PM

Government run amok
Profile Pic
stonecold5005
All-Star Author Waco

Posts:819
Points:20,605
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Jul 14, 2012 9:21:21 AM

ok
Profile Pic
driveonby1
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:1,548
Points:264,865
Joined:Jun 2007
Message Posted: Jul 13, 2012 12:09:32 PM

Police should be better trained in these kinds of things; ultimately, they end up looking emotional and reactionary.
Profile Pic
prius22
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:2,364
Points:416,010
Joined:Apr 2012
Message Posted: Jul 13, 2012 1:58:52 AM

Sad if no real crime was committed.
Profile Pic
prius22
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:2,364
Points:416,010
Joined:Apr 2012
Message Posted: Jul 13, 2012 1:58:52 AM

Sad if no real crime was committed.
Profile Pic
rumbleseat
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:23,067
Points:3,550,120
Joined:Oct 2002
Message Posted: Jul 12, 2012 9:49:12 PM

I still hold to the conviction that a driver who is speeding has mad a conscious decision to do so, and should be accountable for his own actions. In other words, if he gets caught, tough beans, and nobody should be warning him of the radar ahead.
Anybody who says she is helping traffic safety is deluded, because a speeder would slow down, then laugh and speed up afterwards.
While I agree this is no felony, it should, indeed, carry some kind of minor charge, she is, after all, assisting lawbreakers. You would be mighty ticked if burglars were in your home, and some lady ran over and yelled at them that she saw the police coming, so they could get away clean. Same poop, different pile.
Profile Pic
99dakota
Champion Author Providence

Posts:8,255
Points:2,200,100
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Jul 12, 2012 9:32:37 PM

But it's ok to burn a flag and falsely promote yourself as a war hero???
Profile Pic
Mr_Bill_W
All-Star Author Virginia

Posts:581
Points:379,485
Joined:Feb 2012
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2012 10:33:59 PM

I am somewhat surprised that this story is still making its rounds in the media and that the Texas ACLU has not sued the Houston PD over their outrageous conduct...
Profile Pic
Charles_NJ
Rookie Author New Jersey

Posts:9
Points:197,400
Joined:Oct 2011
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2012 11:25:34 AM

Another example of a policeman abusing his/her authority!

What country can you go to for...

Freedom of speech and expression?

Innocent until proven guilty.

Sorry, this is hard... :::Still thinking:::
Profile Pic
stonecold5005
All-Star Author Waco

Posts:819
Points:20,605
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2012 9:13:48 AM

ok
Profile Pic
albert2008
Champion Author Winnipeg

Posts:7,487
Points:1,507,735
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2012 8:43:51 AM

not nice
Profile Pic
Donatelo
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:1,168
Points:307,705
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Jul 9, 2012 7:41:11 AM

ok
Post a reply Back to Topics